Search for: "VASQUEZ v. KNIGHT" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:22 am
 Appellant and Delgado left Vasquez’s home and drove back to appellant’s house where they spent the night. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
Vasquez-Castillo, 258 F.3d 1207, 1211 (10th Cir. 2001), United States v. [read post]